lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:08:24 +0100
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the jc_docs
 tree

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:51:54 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:59 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   a3cb66a50852 ("docs: pretty up sysctl/kernel.rst")
> >
> > from the jc_docs tree and commit:
> >
> >   c480a3b79cbc ("docs: sysctl/kernel: Document BPF entries")
> >
> > from the bpf-next tree.  
> 
> I dropped this commit from bpf-next, since it causes unnecessary conflicts.
> Please steer it via Jon's tree.

OK, I’ll do that.

Regards,

Stephen

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists