[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200315095732.034b64e5@hermes.lan>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 09:57:32 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] iproute2: fix MPLS label parsing
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:16:36 +0100
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
> The initial value of "label" in parse_mpls() is 0xffffffff. Therefore
> we should test for this value, and not 0, to detect if a label has been
> provided. The "!label" test not only fails to detect a missing label
> parameter, it also prevents the use of the IPv4 explicit NULL label,
> which actually equals 0.
>
> Reproducer:
> $ ip link add name dm0 type dummy
> $ tc qdisc add dev dm0 ingress
>
> $ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push
> Error: act_mpls: Label is required for MPLS push.
> We have an error talking to the kernel
> --> Filter was pushed to the kernel, where it got rejected.
>
> $ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push label 0
> Error: argument "label" is required
> --> Label 0 was rejected by iproute2.
>
> Expected result:
> $ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push
> Error: argument "label" is required
> --> Filter was directly rejected by iproute2.
>
> $ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push label 0
> --> Filter is accepted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Applied, thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists