[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13e1c79da12f9c08739e1ba94361d203e2a6627d.1583939416.git.gnault@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:16:36 +0100
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH iproute2] iproute2: fix MPLS label parsing
The initial value of "label" in parse_mpls() is 0xffffffff. Therefore
we should test for this value, and not 0, to detect if a label has been
provided. The "!label" test not only fails to detect a missing label
parameter, it also prevents the use of the IPv4 explicit NULL label,
which actually equals 0.
Reproducer:
$ ip link add name dm0 type dummy
$ tc qdisc add dev dm0 ingress
$ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push
Error: act_mpls: Label is required for MPLS push.
We have an error talking to the kernel
--> Filter was pushed to the kernel, where it got rejected.
$ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push label 0
Error: argument "label" is required
--> Label 0 was rejected by iproute2.
Expected result:
$ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push
Error: argument "label" is required
--> Filter was directly rejected by iproute2.
$ tc filter add dev dm0 parent ffff: matchall action mpls push label 0
--> Filter is accepted.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
---
tc/m_mpls.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tc/m_mpls.c b/tc/m_mpls.c
index 6f3a39f4..50eba01c 100644
--- a/tc/m_mpls.c
+++ b/tc/m_mpls.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int parse_mpls(struct action_util *a, int *argc_p, char ***argv_p,
}
}
- if (action == TCA_MPLS_ACT_PUSH && !label)
+ if (action == TCA_MPLS_ACT_PUSH && label == 0xffffffff)
missarg("label");
if (action == TCA_MPLS_ACT_PUSH && proto &&
--
2.21.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists