[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200316.173330.2197524619383790235.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: luobin9@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com,
luoxianjun@...wei.com, cloud.wangxiaoyun@...wei.com,
yin.yinshi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/6] hinic: fix process of long length skb without
frags
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:44:08 -0700
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:56:25 +0000 Luo bin wrote:
>> -#define MIN_SKB_LEN 17
>> +#define MIN_SKB_LEN 17
>> +#define HINIC_GSO_MAX_SIZE 65536
>
>> + if (unlikely(skb->len > HINIC_GSO_MAX_SIZE && nr_sges == 1)) {
>> + txq->txq_stats.frag_len_overflow++;
>> + goto skb_error;
>> + }
>
> I don't think drivers should have to check this condition.
>
> We have netdev->gso_max_size which should be initialized to
>
> include/linux/netdevice.h:#define GSO_MAX_SIZE 65536
>
> in
>
> net/core/dev.c: dev->gso_max_size = GSO_MAX_SIZE;
>
> Please send a patch to pktgen to uphold the normal stack guarantees.
Agreed, the driver should not have to validate this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists