[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200320.085240.1137730407369663617.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: bridge: vlan options: nest the
tunnel options
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:23:01 +0200
> After a discussion with Roopa about the new tunnel vlan option, she
> suggested that we'll be adding more tunnel options and attributes, so
> it'd be better to have them all grouped together under one main vlan
> entry tunnel attribute instead of making them all main attributes. Since
> the tunnel code was added in this net-next cycle and still hasn't been
> released we can easily nest the BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_TUNNEL_ID attribute
> in BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_TUNNEL_INFO and allow for any new tunnel
> attributes to be added there. In addition one positive side-effect is
> that we can remove the outside vlan info flag which controlled the
> operation (setlink/dellink) and move it under a new nested attribute so
> user-space can specify it explicitly.
>
> Thus the vlan tunnel format becomes:
> [BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY]
> [BRIDGE_VLANDB_ENTRY_TUNNEL_INFO]
> [BRIDGE_VLANDB_TINFO_ID]
> [BRIDGE_VLANDB_TINFO_CMD]
> ...
Makes sense, series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists