[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <731810bd-7e8f-8e34-304a-52e0f1286ba0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:45:22 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: remove XCVR_DUMMY entries
On 22.03.2020 15:08, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 02:14:20PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> The transceiver dummy entries are not used any longer, so remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
>> index d586ee5e1..77721ea36 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
>> @@ -1673,9 +1673,6 @@ static inline int ethtool_validate_duplex(__u8 duplex)
>> /* Which transceiver to use. */
>> #define XCVR_INTERNAL 0x00 /* PHY and MAC are in the same package */
>> #define XCVR_EXTERNAL 0x01 /* PHY and MAC are in different packages */
>> -#define XCVR_DUMMY1 0x02
>> -#define XCVR_DUMMY2 0x03
>> -#define XCVR_DUMMY3 0x04
>
> Hi Heiner
>
Hi Andrew
> We need to be careful here. This is a UAPI header. The kernel might
> not use them, but is there any user space code using them?
>
Right. I checked ethtool and it doesn't use the dummy values.
Wherever I checked only the internal/external values are used.
In kernel last usage of the dummy values was removed 2yrs ago,
see e.g. here: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/767218/
> A quick search found:
>
> http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/doc/api/ethtool_8c_source.html
>
I checked here http://git.infradead.org/users/tgr/libnl.git and there
hasn't been such an ethtool.c file for ages.
> Andrew
>
Heiner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists