[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200324081311.ww6p7dmijbddi5jm@wunner.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:13:11 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Petr Stetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] net: ks8851: Use 16-bit writes to program MAC
address
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:42:56AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On the SPI variant of KS8851, the MAC address can be programmed with
> either 8/16/32-bit writes. To make it easier to support the 16-bit
> parallel option of KS8851 too, switch both the MAC address programming
> and readout to 16-bit operations.
[...]
> static int ks8851_write_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct ks8851_net *ks = netdev_priv(dev);
> + u16 val;
> int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&ks->lock);
> @@ -358,8 +329,12 @@ static int ks8851_write_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev)
> * the first write to the MAC address does not take effect.
> */
> ks8851_set_powermode(ks, PMECR_PM_NORMAL);
> - for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> - ks8851_wrreg8(ks, KS_MAR(i), dev->dev_addr[i]);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i += 2) {
> + val = (dev->dev_addr[i] << 8) | dev->dev_addr[i + 1];
> + ks8851_wrreg16(ks, KS_MAR(i + 1), val);
> + }
> +
This looks like it won't work on little-endian machines: The MAC bytes
are stored in dev->dev_addr as 012345, but in the EEPROM they're stored
as 543210. The first 16-bit value that you write is 10 on big-endian
and 01 on little-endian if I'm not mistaken.
By only writing 8-bit values, the original author elegantly sidestepped
this issue.
Maybe the simplest and most readable solution is something like:
u8 val[2];
...
val[0] = dev->dev_addr[i+1];
val[1] = dev->dev_addr;
Then cast val to a u16 when passing it to ks8851_wrreg16().
Alternatively, use cpu_to_be16().
> static void ks8851_read_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct ks8851_net *ks = netdev_priv(dev);
> + u16 reg;
> int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&ks->lock);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> - dev->dev_addr[i] = ks8851_rdreg8(ks, KS_MAR(i));
> + for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i += 2) {
> + reg = ks8851_rdreg16(ks, KS_MAR(i + 1));
> + dev->dev_addr[i] = reg & 0xff;
> + dev->dev_addr[i + 1] = reg >> 8;
> + }
Same here.
These seem to be the only two places where KS_MAR() is used.
You may want to adjust that macro so that you don't have to add 1
in each of the two places.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists