[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200324133412.GO31519@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:34:12 +0100
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...lanox.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
maximmi@...lanox.com, moshe@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: fix incorrect tx-checksumming settings
reporting
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:08PM +0200, Vladyslav Tarasiuk wrote:
> Currently, ethtool feature mask for checksum command is ORed with
> NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC_BIT, which is bit's position number, instead of the
> actual feature bit - NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC.
>
> The invalid bitmask here might affect unrelated features when toggling
> TX checksumming. For example, TX checksumming is always mistakenly
> reported as enabled on the netdevs tested (mlx5, virtio_net).
>
> Fixes: f70bb06563ed ("ethtool: update mapping of features to legacy ioctl requests")
> Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@...lanox.com>
> ---
Stupid mistake... sorry for that. I even realized now how I managed to
miss it when I tested the patch: out of habit, I ran patched ethtool
which used netlink so that it did not call this function at all and
showed expected results. :-(
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> index 3852a58d7f95..10d929abdf6a 100644
> --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static netdev_features_t ethtool_get_feature_mask(u32 eth_cmd)
> switch (eth_cmd) {
> case ETHTOOL_GTXCSUM:
> case ETHTOOL_STXCSUM:
> - return NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK | NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC_BIT |
> + return NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK | NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC |
> NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC;
> case ETHTOOL_GRXCSUM:
> case ETHTOOL_SRXCSUM:
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists