[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158506137648.157373.6196697912192436523@kwain>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:49:37 +0100
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: mscc: consolidate a common RGMII delay implementation
Hi Vladimir,
Quoting Andrew Lunn (2020-03-24 15:18:29)
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 04:13:58PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> >
> > It looks like the VSC8584 PHY driver is rolling its own RGMII delay
> > configuration code, despite the fact that the logic is mostly the same.
> >
> > In fact only the register layout and position for the RGMII controls has
> > changed. So we need to adapt and parameterize the PHY-dependent bit
> > fields when calling the new generic function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Tested-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
Thanks!
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists