lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 16:11:05 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> To: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing program when attaching XDP On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:06 PM Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com> wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 19:40, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > At this point I don't believe in your good intent. > > Your repeated attacks on BPF in every thread are out of control. > > I kept ignoring your insults for long time, but I cannot do this anymore. > > Please find other threads to contribute your opinions. > > They are not welcomed here. > Given that this clearly won't land in this cycle (and neither will bpf_link > for XDP), can I suggest thateveryone involved steps back from the subject > for a few days to let tempers cool? It's getting to the point where people > are burning bridges and saying things they might regret. > I know everyone is under a lot of stress right now. Same opinion a day later. No regrets.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists