[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3659efd7-4e72-6bff-5657-c1270e8553f4@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:24:14 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net,
johannes@...solutions.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
natechancellor@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bitfield.h: add FIELD_MAX() and field_max()
On 4/1/20 12:35 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> Define FIELD_MAX(), which supplies the maximum value that can be
>> represented by a field value. Define field_max() as well, to go
>> along with the lower-case forms of the field mask functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
>> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> v3: Rebased on latest netdev-next/master.
>>
>> David, please take this into net-next as soon as possible. When the
>> IPA code was merged the other day this prerequisite patch was not
>> included, and as a result the IPA driver fails to build. Thank you.
>>
>> See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/10/1839
>>
>> -Alex
>
> In particular, this seems to now have regressed into mainline for the 5.7
> merge window as reported by Linaro's ToolChain Working Group's CI.
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/963
Is the problem you're referring to the result of a build done
in the midst of a bisect?
The fix for this build error is currently present in the
torvalds/linux.git master branch:
6fcd42242ebc soc: qcom: ipa: kill IPA_RX_BUFFER_ORDER
I may be mistaken, but I believe this is the same problem I discussed
with Maxim Kuvyrkov this morning. A different build problem led to
an automated bisect, which conluded this was the cause because it
landed somewhere between the initial pull of the IPA code and the fix
I reference above.
-Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists