[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c93a2c75e55291473370d9805f8dd0484acd5a3.camel@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:02:55 +0200
From: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bgregg@...flix.com,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: Add d_path helper
On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 13:09 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> + * int bpf_d_path(struct path *path, char *buf, u32 sz)
> + * Description
> + * Return full path for given 'struct path' object, which
> + * needs to be the kernel BTF 'path' object. The path is
> + * returned in buffer provided 'buf' of size 'sz'.
> + *
> + * Return
> + * length of returned string on success, or a negative
> + * error in case of failure
> + *
You might want to add that d_path is ambiguous since it can add
" (deleted)" at the end of your path and you don't know whether this is
actually part of the file path or not. :)
> +BPF_CALL_3(bpf_d_path, struct path *, path, char *, buf, u32, sz)
> +{
> + char *p = d_path(path, buf, sz - 1);
I am curious why you'd use sz - 1 here? In my experience, d_path's
output is 0 limited so you shouldn't need to keep an extra byte for
that (if that was the intention here).
> + int len;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(p)) {
> + len = PTR_ERR(p);
> + } else {
> + len = strlen(p);
> + if (len && p != buf) {
> + memmove(buf, p, len);
Have you considered returning the offset within buf instead and let the
BPF program do pointer arithmetics to find the beginning of the string?
> + buf[len] = 0;
If my previous comment about sz - 1 is true, then this wouldn't be
necessary, you could just use memmove with len + 1.
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return len;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists