[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200411001933.10072-3-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 01:19:26 +0100
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Roy Luo <royluo@...gle.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org (open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN
DRIVER), netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS),
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support),
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC
support)
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] mt76: remove unnecessary annotations
Sparse report warnings at mt76_tx_status_unlock() and mt76_tx_status_lock()
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_lock() - wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_unlock() - unexpected unlock
The root cause is the additional __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock)
and __release(&dev->status_list.unlock) called
from inside mt76_tx_status_lock() and mt76_tx_status_unlock().
Remove __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock) annotation
Remove __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
Correct &dev->status_list.unlock to &dev->status_list.lock
-unlock not defined in the sk_buff_head struct
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
index 7ee91d946882..7581ba9c2e95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
@@ -101,18 +101,16 @@ mt76_tx_status_lock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
{
__skb_queue_head_init(list);
spin_lock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_tx_status_lock);
void
mt76_tx_status_unlock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
- __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
+ __releases(&dev->status_list.lock)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
spin_unlock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __release(&dev->status_list.unlock);
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
ieee80211_tx_status(dev->hw, skb);
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists