[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB3266B788233057BB024B92B3D3DD0@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:01:42 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v1] net/sched: Don't print dump stack in event of
transmission timeout
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Date: Apr/13/2020, 11:54:08 (UTC+00:00)
> Sorry, if I misunderstood you, but you are proposing to count traffic, right?
>
> If yes, RDMA traffic bypasses the SW stack and not visible to the kernel, hence
> the BQL will count only ETH portion of that mixed traffic, while RDMA traffic
> is the one who "blocked" transmission channel (QP in RDMA terminology).
Sorry but you don't mention in your commit message that this is RDMA
specific so that's why I brought up the topic of BQL. Apologies for the
misunderstood.
---
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists