lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:37:03 +0800
From:   Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kafai@...com>,
        <songliubraving@...com>, <yhs@...com>, <andriin@...com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...omium.org>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] bpf: remove set but not used variable 'dst_known'

Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5603:18: warning: variable ‘dst_known’
set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

It is not used since commit f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier:
rework value tracking")

Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 04c6630cc18f..c9f50969a689 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
 	u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
-	bool src_known, dst_known;
+	bool src_known;
 	s64 smin_val, smax_val;
 	u64 umin_val, umax_val;
 	s32 s32_min_val, s32_max_val;
@@ -5622,7 +5622,6 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 
 	if (alu32) {
 		src_known = tnum_subreg_is_const(src_reg.var_off);
-		dst_known = tnum_subreg_is_const(dst_reg->var_off);
 		if ((src_known &&
 		     (s32_min_val != s32_max_val || u32_min_val != u32_max_val)) ||
 		    s32_min_val > s32_max_val || u32_min_val > u32_max_val) {
@@ -5634,7 +5633,6 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		}
 	} else {
 		src_known = tnum_is_const(src_reg.var_off);
-		dst_known = tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off);
 		if ((src_known &&
 		     (smin_val != smax_val || umin_val != umax_val)) ||
 		    smin_val > smax_val || umin_val > umax_val) {
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists