[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03d9f8d9-620c-1f8b-9c58-60b824fa626c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:46:44 +0300
From: Lauri Jakku <ljakku77@...il.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com
Subject: Re: NET: r8168/r8169 identifying fix
Hi,
Fair enough, i'll strip them.
-lja
On 2020-04-13 14:34, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:02:01PM +0300, Lauri Jakku wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Comments inline.
>>
>> On 2020-04-13 13:58, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 01:30:13PM +0300, Lauri Jakku wrote:
>>>> From 2d41edd4e6455187094f3a13d58c46eeee35aa31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Lauri Jakku <lja@....fi>
>>>> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:18:35 +0300
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] NET: r8168/r8169 identifying fix
>>>>
>>>> The driver installation determination made properly by
>>>> checking PHY vs DRIVER id's.
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 11 +++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I would say that most of the code is debug prints.
>>>
>>
>> I tought that they are helpful to keep, they are using the debug calls, so
>> they are not visible if user does not like those.
>
> You are missing the point of who are your users.
>
> Users want to have working device and the code. They don't need or like
> to debug their kernel.
>
> Thanks
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists