lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:08:40 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 27/35] netfilter: nf_tables: Allow set
 back-ends to report partial overlaps on insertion

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:38:58PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:39:00 -0400
>Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:18:48AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>>
>> >I'm used to not Cc: stable on networking patches (Dave's net.git),
>> >but I guess I should instead if they go through nf.git (Pablo's tree),
>> >right?
>>
>> Yup, this confusion has caused for quite a few netfilter fixes to not
>> land in -stable. If it goes through Pablo's tree (and unless he intructs
>> otherwise), you should Cc stable.
>
>Hah, thanks for clarifying.
>
>What do you think I should do specifically with 72239f2795fa
>("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection
>on insertion")?
>
>I haven't Cc'ed stable on that one. Can I expect AUTOSEL to pick it up
>anyway?

I'll make sure it gets queued up when it hits Linus's tree :)

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists