[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200414150840.GD1068@sasha-vm>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:08:40 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 27/35] netfilter: nf_tables: Allow set
back-ends to report partial overlaps on insertion
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:38:58PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:39:00 -0400
>Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:18:48AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>>
>> >I'm used to not Cc: stable on networking patches (Dave's net.git),
>> >but I guess I should instead if they go through nf.git (Pablo's tree),
>> >right?
>>
>> Yup, this confusion has caused for quite a few netfilter fixes to not
>> land in -stable. If it goes through Pablo's tree (and unless he intructs
>> otherwise), you should Cc stable.
>
>Hah, thanks for clarifying.
>
>What do you think I should do specifically with 72239f2795fa
>("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection
>on insertion")?
>
>I haven't Cc'ed stable on that one. Can I expect AUTOSEL to pick it up
>anyway?
I'll make sure it gets queued up when it hits Linus's tree :)
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists