[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200421113221.rvh3jkjet32m6ng4@salvia>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:32:21 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 27/35] netfilter: nf_tables: Allow set
back-ends to report partial overlaps on insertion
Hi Sasha,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:08:40AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:38:58PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:39:00 -0400
> > Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:18:48AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'm used to not Cc: stable on networking patches (Dave's net.git),
> > > >but I guess I should instead if they go through nf.git (Pablo's tree),
> > > >right?
> > >
> > > Yup, this confusion has caused for quite a few netfilter fixes to not
> > > land in -stable. If it goes through Pablo's tree (and unless he intructs
> > > otherwise), you should Cc stable.
> >
> > Hah, thanks for clarifying.
> >
> > What do you think I should do specifically with 72239f2795fa
> > ("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection
> > on insertion")?
> >
> > I haven't Cc'ed stable on that one. Can I expect AUTOSEL to pick it up
> > anyway?
>
> I'll make sure it gets queued up when it hits Linus's tree :)
5.6.6 is out and this fix is still not included...
Would you please enqueue...
commit 72239f2795fab9a58633bd0399698ff7581534a3
Author: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 1 17:14:38 2020 +0200
netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection on insertion
for 5.6.x -stable ?
Thank you very much.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists