lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:35:15 +0200
From:   Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
To:     magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn.topel@...el.com, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        jonathan.lemon@...il.com
Cc:     minhquangbui99@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] xsk: add missing check on user supplied headroom size

Add a check that the headroom cannot be larger than the available
space in the chunk. In the current code, a malicious user can set the
headroom to a value larger than the chunk size minus the fixed XDP
headroom. That way packets with a length larger than the supported
size in the umem could get accepted and result in an out-of-bounds
write.

Fixes: c0c77d8fb787 ("xsk: add user memory registration support sockopt")
Reported-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207225
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
---
 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
index fa7bb5e..ed7a606 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
 	u32 chunk_size = mr->chunk_size, headroom = mr->headroom;
 	unsigned int chunks, chunks_per_page;
 	u64 addr = mr->addr, size = mr->len;
-	int size_chk, err;
+	int err;
 
 	if (chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE || chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
 		/* Strictly speaking we could support this, if:
@@ -382,8 +382,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	size_chk = chunk_size - headroom - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
-	if (size_chk < 0)
+	if (headroom >= chunk_size - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	umem->address = (unsigned long)addr;
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ