[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200415172243.GA3661754@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:22:43 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org, wg@...ndegger.com,
mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 068/129] slcan: Don't transmit uninitialized
stack data in padding
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:09:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> How does this differ from Greg's backports of this patches?
His tool didn't catch that they are already in a merged tree, it's a few
steps later that this happens :)
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists