netdev - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 068/129] slcan: Don't transmit uninitialized stack data in padding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:22:43 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org, wg@...ndegger.com,
        mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 068/129] slcan: Don't transmit uninitialized
 stack data in padding

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:09:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> How does this differ from Greg's backports of this patches?

His tool didn't catch that they are already in a merged tree, it's a few
steps later that this happens :)

greg k-h