netdev - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 068/129] slcan: Don't transmit uninitialized stack data in padding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200416000409.GM1068@sasha-vm>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:04:09 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, security@...nel.org, wg@...ndegger.com,
        mkl@...gutronix.de, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 068/129] slcan: Don't transmit uninitialized
 stack data in padding

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:22:43PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:09:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> How does this differ from Greg's backports of this patches?
>
>His tool didn't catch that they are already in a merged tree, it's a few
>steps later that this happens :)

My process for doing these takes a day or two (or three) to build test,
test, and send mails. Sometimes Greg beats me to it :)

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha