[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40316054-5e39-f1fa-81f2-bfda787d2167@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:18:28 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Kaestle <peter@...e.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>,
Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] thermal: of: Monitor thermal zone after enabling it
On 4/7/20 7:49 PM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> thermal/of calls its own ->set_mode() method, so monitor thermal zone
> afterwards. This is needed for the DISABLED->ENABLED transition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> index b7621dfab17c..cf2c43ebcb78 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> @@ -523,8 +523,11 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, void *data,
> if (sensor_specs.np == sensor_np && id == sensor_id) {
> tzd = thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, sensor_np,
> data, ops);
> - if (!IS_ERR(tzd))
> + if (!IS_ERR(tzd)) {
> tzd->ops->set_mode(tzd, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
> + thermal_zone_device_update(tzd,
> + THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> + }
>
> of_node_put(sensor_specs.np);
> of_node_put(child);
>
This patch is bogus/redundant, please look at ->set_mode implementation for
thermal/of drivers:
static int of_thermal_set_mode(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
enum thermal_device_mode mode)
{
struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata;
mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
if (mode == THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED) {
tz->polling_delay = data->polling_delay;
tz->passive_delay = data->passive_delay;
} else {
tz->polling_delay = 0;
tz->passive_delay = 0;
}
mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
data->mode = mode;
thermal_zone_device_update(tz, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
return 0;
}
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists