[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+TZYsMojXinu7toMMUCzWvg5_yvqeX8V1tY1hd8fD-NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:14:07 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc: "eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"willemb@...gle.com" <willemb@...gle.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4_en: avoid indirect call in TX completion
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:02 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 05:09 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 8:55 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 09:46 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > Commit 9ecc2d86171a ("net/mlx4_en: add xdp forwarding and data
> > > > write
> > > > support")
> > > > brought another indirect call in fast path.
> > > >
> > > > Use INDIRECT_CALL_2() helper to avoid the cost of the indirect
> > > > call
> > > > when/if CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > > Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
> > > > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Hi Eric, I believe net-next is still closed.
> > >
> > > But FWIW,
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> > >
> >
> > Well, this can be pushed to net then, since this is a trivial patch
> > that helps performance.
> >
> > With this COVID-19 thing, we need more capacity from the serving
> > fleet
> > (Youtube and all..)
> > distributed all over the world and using a high number of CX-3 NIC.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I don't mind, either net or net-next is fine by me, up to Dave,
>
> although we are missing the Fixes Tag ..
>
> Fixes: 9ecc2d86171a ("net/mlx4_en: add xdp forwarding and data write
> support")
I chose not adding this tag, because at the time of this commit,
we had not yet the INDIRECT_CALL() infrastructure.
I want to avoid requests from stable teams about backporting too many patches :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists