lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ce41ba7497a377260905d75349aeb8f6cc803e20.1587473171.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:46:11 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Subject: [PATCH ipsec] ip_vti: receive ipip packet by calling ip_tunnel_rcv

In Commit dd9ee3444014 ("vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in
'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel"), it tries to receive IPIP packets in vti
by calling xfrm_input(). This case happens when a small packet or
frag sent by peer is too small to get compressed.

However, xfrm_input() will still get to the IPCOMP path where skb
sec_path is set, but never dropped while it should have been done
in vti_ipcomp4_protocol.cb_handler(vti_rcv_cb), as it's not an
ipcomp4 packet. This will cause that the packet can never pass
xfrm4_policy_check() in the upper protocol rcv functions.

So this patch is to call ip_tunnel_rcv() to process IPIP packets
instead.

Fixes: dd9ee3444014 ("vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel")
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
index 1b4e6f2..1dda7c1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
@@ -93,7 +93,28 @@ static int vti_rcv_proto(struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 static int vti_rcv_tunnel(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	return vti_rcv(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, true);
+	struct ip_tunnel_net *itn = net_generic(dev_net(skb->dev), vti_net_id);
+	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
+	struct ip_tunnel *tunnel;
+
+	tunnel = ip_tunnel_lookup(itn, skb->dev->ifindex, TUNNEL_NO_KEY,
+				  iph->saddr, iph->daddr, 0);
+	if (tunnel) {
+		struct tnl_ptk_info tpi = {
+			.proto = htons(ETH_P_IP),
+		};
+
+		if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
+			goto drop;
+		if (iptunnel_pull_header(skb, 0, tpi.proto, false))
+			goto drop;
+		return ip_tunnel_rcv(tunnel, skb, &tpi, NULL, false);
+	}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+drop:
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
-- 
2.1.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ