[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200421171552.28393-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:15:52 -0700
From: Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf, x32: Fix clobbering of dst for BPF_JSET
The current JIT clobbers the destination register for BPF_JSET BPF_X
and BPF_K by using "and" and "or" instructions. This is fine when the
destination register is a temporary loaded from a register stored on
the stack but not otherwise.
This patch fixes the problem (for both BPF_K and BPF_X) by always loading
the destination register into temporaries since BPF_JSET should not
modify the destination register.
This bug may not be currently triggerable as BPF_REG_AX is the only
register not stored on the stack and the verifier uses it in a limited
way.
Fixes: 03f5781be2c7b ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32")
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index cc9ad3892ea6..ba7d9ccfc662 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -2015,8 +2015,8 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_X: {
bool is_jmp64 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP;
- u8 dreg_lo = dstk ? IA32_EAX : dst_lo;
- u8 dreg_hi = dstk ? IA32_EDX : dst_hi;
+ u8 dreg_lo = IA32_EAX;
+ u8 dreg_hi = IA32_EDX;
u8 sreg_lo = sstk ? IA32_ECX : src_lo;
u8 sreg_hi = sstk ? IA32_EBX : src_hi;
@@ -2028,6 +2028,13 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
add_2reg(0x40, IA32_EBP,
IA32_EDX),
STACK_VAR(dst_hi));
+ } else {
+ /* mov dreg_lo,dst_lo */
+ EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dst_lo));
+ if (is_jmp64)
+ /* mov dreg_hi,dst_hi */
+ EMIT2(0x89,
+ add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dst_hi));
}
if (sstk) {
@@ -2052,8 +2059,8 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K: {
bool is_jmp64 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP;
- u8 dreg_lo = dstk ? IA32_EAX : dst_lo;
- u8 dreg_hi = dstk ? IA32_EDX : dst_hi;
+ u8 dreg_lo = IA32_EAX;
+ u8 dreg_hi = IA32_EDX;
u8 sreg_lo = IA32_ECX;
u8 sreg_hi = IA32_EBX;
u32 hi;
@@ -2066,6 +2073,13 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
add_2reg(0x40, IA32_EBP,
IA32_EDX),
STACK_VAR(dst_hi));
+ } else {
+ /* mov dreg_lo,dst_lo */
+ EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, dst_lo));
+ if (is_jmp64)
+ /* mov dreg_hi,dst_hi */
+ EMIT2(0x89,
+ add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, dst_hi));
}
/* mov ecx,imm32 */
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists