[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200423073007.3566-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:30:07 +0800
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: yhchuang@...ltek.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org (open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER
(rtw88)), netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context
It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
Fixes: 6343a6d4b213 ("rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit")
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
---
v2:
- Add Fixes tag.
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
index 245da96dfddc..8f998b4a7234 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
@@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ static void rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
goto out;
}
- ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw_read8, box_state,
- !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000, false,
- rtwdev, REG_HMETFR);
+ ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(rtw_read8, box_state,
+ !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000,
+ false, rtwdev, REG_HMETFR);
if (ret) {
rtw_err(rtwdev, "failed to send h2c command\n");
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists