netdev - Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:36:16 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 04:59:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> OK, I can live with that; further work can live on top of that, anyway.
> How are we going to handle that?  I can put it into never-rebased branch
> in vfs.git (#work.sysctl), so that people could pull that.
> 
> FWIW, I'm putting together more uaccess stuff (will probably hit -next
> tonight or tomorrow); this would fit well there...

Sounds good to me.  The first patch isn't really needed for the series
and could go in through the bpf tree.