netdev - Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:15:08 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 07:36:16AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 04:59:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > OK, I can live with that; further work can live on top of that, anyway.
> > How are we going to handle that?  I can put it into never-rebased branch
> > in vfs.git (#work.sysctl), so that people could pull that.
> > 
> > FWIW, I'm putting together more uaccess stuff (will probably hit -next
> > tonight or tomorrow); this would fit well there...
> 
> Sounds good to me.  The first patch isn't really needed for the series
> and could go in through the bpf tree.

OK, ##2--5 are in #work.sysctl, based at 5.7-rc1