[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429152519.GB66424@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:25:19 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Badel, Laurent" <LaurentBadel@...on.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"richard.leitner@...data.com" <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"alexander.levin@...rosoft.com" <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
"Quette, Arnaud" <ArnaudQuette@...on.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit
1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828
> Test results: using an iMX28-EVK-based board, this patch successfully
> restores network interface functionality when interrupts are enabled.
> Tested using both linux-5.4.23 and latest mainline (5.6.0) kernels.
Hi Laurent
What tree are these patches against?
That is why i pointed you to the netdev FAQ.
Also, for a multi-part series, you should add a cover latter.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists