lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:48:56 +0000
From:   "Badel, Laurent" <LaurentBadel@...on.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "richard.leitner@...data.com" <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "alexander.levin@...rosoft.com" <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
        "Quette, Arnaud" <ArnaudQuette@...on.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL]  Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit
 1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828

´╗┐Hi Andrew, 

Thanks for the reply. It's the mainline tree, was 5.6.-rc7 at the time.
There's no tree mentioned for the ethernet PHY library in the maintainers files, 
but am I expected to test against net/ or net-next/ ? 
I'm happy to do so but should I use rather use net/ since this is more of a bugfix? 

Best regards,

Laurent

> 

-----------------------------
Eaton Industries Manufacturing GmbH ~ Registered place of business: Route de la Longeraie 7, 1110, Morges, Switzerland 

-----------------------------

-----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 5:25 PM
> To: Badel, Laurent <LaurentBadel@...on.com>
> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; fugang.duan@....com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; f.fainelli@...il.com; hkallweit1@...il.com;
> linux@...linux.org.uk; richard.leitner@...data.com;
> davem@...emloft.net; alexander.levin@...rosoft.com; Quette, Arnaud
> <ArnaudQuette@...on.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit
> 1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828
> 
> > Test results: using an iMX28-EVK-based board, this patch successfully
> > restores network interface functionality when interrupts are enabled.
> > Tested using both linux-5.4.23 and latest mainline (5.6.0) kernels.
> 
> Hi Laurent
> 
> What tree are these patches against?
> 
> That is why i pointed you to the netdev FAQ.
> 
> Also, for a multi-part series, you should add a cover latter.
> 
>      Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists