lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:35:10 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     "Badel, Laurent" <LaurentBadel@...on.com>
Cc:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "richard.leitner@...data.com" <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "alexander.levin@...rosoft.com" <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
        "Quette, Arnaud" <ArnaudQuette@...on.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]  Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit
 1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:48:56PM +0000, Badel, Laurent wrote:
> ´╗┐Hi Andrew, 
> 
> Thanks for the reply. It's the mainline tree, was 5.6.-rc7 at the time.
> There's no tree mentioned for the ethernet PHY library in the maintainers files, 
> but am I expected to test against net/ or net-next/ ? 
> I'm happy to do so but should I use rather use net/ since this is more of a bugfix? 

The netdev FAQ talks about this. You need to submit against net, to
David Miller.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists