[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429163510.GD66424@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:35:10 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Badel, Laurent" <LaurentBadel@...on.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"richard.leitner@...data.com" <richard.leitner@...data.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"alexander.levin@...rosoft.com" <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
"Quette, Arnaud" <ArnaudQuette@...on.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit
1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:48:56PM +0000, Badel, Laurent wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the reply. It's the mainline tree, was 5.6.-rc7 at the time.
> There's no tree mentioned for the ethernet PHY library in the maintainers files,
> but am I expected to test against net/ or net-next/ ?
> I'm happy to do so but should I use rather use net/ since this is more of a bugfix?
The netdev FAQ talks about this. You need to submit against net, to
David Miller.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists