lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 16:49:59 -0400
From:   Murali Karicheri <>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <>,
        <>, <>, <>,
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: hsr: fix incorrect type usage for protocol

Hi Vinicius,

On 5/6/20 1:33 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Hi Murali,
> Murali Karicheri <> writes:
>> Fix following sparse checker warning:-
>> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
>> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] protocol
>> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18:    got restricted __be16 [usertype] h_proto
>> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:39:25: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer
>> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:39:57: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer
>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <>
>> ---
> I think this patch should go via the net tree, as it is a warning fix.
> Anyway...
> Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <>
Thanks. I will re-send it with net prefix and you ack. I thought since
this is just a warning, it is not that serious to include in net tree.

Murali Karicheri
Texas Instruments

Powered by blists - more mailing lists