lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:17 +0300
From:   Vadym Kochan <>
To:     Andrew Lunn <>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <>,,
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <>,
        Serhiy Boiko <>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <>,
        Taras Chornyi <>,
        Andrii Savka <>,
        Jiri Pirko <>,
        Ido Schimmel <>,
        Chris Packham <>
Subject: Re: [RFC next-next v2 1/5] net: marvell: prestera: Add driver for
 Prestera family ASIC devices

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:53:59PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Looks like it might be hard for the board manufacturing? I mean each
> > board item need to have updated dtb file with base mac address, instead
> > to have common dtb for the board type.
> > 
> > And it sounds that platform data might be the way in case if the vendor
> > will implement platform device driver which will handle reading base mac
> > from eeprom (or other storage) depending on the board and put it to the
> > platform data which will be provided to prestera driver ?
> Hi Vadym
> This is not a new problem. Go look at the standard solutions to this.
> of_get_mac_address(), eth_platform_get_mac_address(),
> nvmem_get_mac_address(), of_get_mac_addr_nvmem(), etc.
>   Andrew

Thank you! I will look on it!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists