[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511141117.GF25096@plvision.eu>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:17 +0300
From: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@...ision.eu>,
Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@...ision.eu>,
Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>,
Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@...ision.eu>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [RFC next-next v2 1/5] net: marvell: prestera: Add driver for
Prestera family ASIC devices
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:53:59PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Looks like it might be hard for the board manufacturing? I mean each
> > board item need to have updated dtb file with base mac address, instead
> > to have common dtb for the board type.
> >
> > And it sounds that platform data might be the way in case if the vendor
> > will implement platform device driver which will handle reading base mac
> > from eeprom (or other storage) depending on the board and put it to the
> > platform data which will be provided to prestera driver ?
>
> Hi Vadym
>
> This is not a new problem. Go look at the standard solutions to this.
>
> of_get_mac_address(), eth_platform_get_mac_address(),
> nvmem_get_mac_address(), of_get_mac_addr_nvmem(), etc.
>
> Andrew
Thank you! I will look on it!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists