netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] sfc: make capability checking a nic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202005120824.MqtuMTak%lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 09:01:32 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] sfc: make capability checking a nic_type
 function

Hi Edward,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.7-rc5 next-20200511]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Edward-Cree/sfc-remove-nic_data-usage-in-common-code/20200512-011744
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git a6f0b26d6a5dcf27980e65f965779a929039f11d
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-191-gc51a0382-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena.c:951:14: sparse: sparse: symbol 'siena_check_caps' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org