netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Use IS_ERR() to check and simplify code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <febc1254-ad7f-f564-6607-9ac89f1fcf40@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 17:48:10 +0800
From:   Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Use IS_ERR() to check and simplify code

Hi David:

On 2020/5/8 4:18, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Date: Thu,  7 May 2020 19:50:10 +0800
>
>> Use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() instead of PTR_ZRR_OR_ZERO()
>> to simplify code, avoid redundant judgements.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Saeed, please pick this up.

Does this mean the patch has been received and I just have to wait?

Thanks,

Tang Bin