lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 22:28:22 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com" <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5e: Use IS_ERR() to check and simplify code

On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 17:48 +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
> Hi David:
> 
> On 2020/5/8 4:18, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> > Date: Thu,  7 May 2020 19:50:10 +0800
> > 
> > > Use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() instead of PTR_ZRR_OR_ZERO()
                                            ^^^^^^^ typo
> > > to simplify code, avoid redundant judgements.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
> > Saeed, please pick this up.
> 
> Does this mean the patch has been received and I just have to wait?
> 

no, mlx5 patches normally go to net-next-mlx5 branch and usually
pulled into net-next once a week when i send my pull requests.

i will reply with "applied" when i apply this patch,
but for now please fix the typo.

Thanks,
Saeed

Powered by blists - more mailing lists