[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515152640.4d2ec3dc@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:26:40 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] ethtool: check if there is at least one
channel for TX/RX in the core
On Fri, 15 May 2020 22:56:56 +0200 Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:49:00PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Having a channel config with no ability to RX or TX traffic is
> > clearly wrong. Check for this in the core so the drivers don't
> > have to.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Thanks for the reviews!
> > @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ int ethnl_set_channels(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > ethnl_update_u32(&channels.other_count,
> > tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_OTHER_COUNT], &mod);
> > ethnl_update_u32(&channels.combined_count,
> > - tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_COMBINED_COUNT], &mod);
> > + tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_COMBINED_COUNT], &mod_combined);
> > + mod |= mod_combined;
> > ret = 0;
> > if (!mod)
> > goto out_ops;
>
> Bitwise or should do the right thing but using "|=" on bool variables
> looks strange.
Interesting, I never thought about it in this way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists