[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514210454.GB499265@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 23:04:54 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
robh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dp83822: Add TI dp83822
phy
> Why would we need 2? The SFP core would need to know that the LOS is
> connected to the PHY.
That is possible today. Just don't list the GPIO when declaring the
SFP.
> The PHY is strapped to configure the LED_1 as a GPIO input. I am
> not seeing a register that we can force this configuration.
Ah, O.K. If it is selected via strapping only, they an additional
property is not needed.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists