netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2/net-next] man: tc-ct.8: Add manual page for ct tc action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <942b3402-f5c8-2d32-8a5e-4f1ae0ad6ab4@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 19:02:59 +0300
From:   Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Cc:     ozsh@...lanox.com, roid@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2/net-next] man: tc-ct.8: Add manual page for ct tc
 action


On 18/05/2020 17:56, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/14/20 8:10 AM, Paul Blakey wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>>  man/man8/tc-ct.8     | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  man/man8/tc-flower.8 |   6 +++
>>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 man/man8/tc-ct.8
>>
>> diff --git a/man/man8/tc-ct.8 b/man/man8/tc-ct.8
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..45d2932
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/man/man8/tc-ct.8
>> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
>> +.TH "ct action in tc" 8 "14 May 2020" "iproute2" "Linux"
>> +.SH NAME
>> +ct \- tc connection tracking action
>> +.SH SYNOPSIS
>> +.in +8
>> +.ti -8
>> +.BR "tc ... action ct commit [ force ] [ zone "
>> +.IR ZONE
>> +.BR "] [ mark "
>> +.IR MASKED_MARK
>> +.BR "] [ label "
>> +.IR MASKED_LABEL
>> +.BR "] [ nat "
>> +.IR NAT_SPEC
>> +.BR "]"
>> +
>> +.ti -8
>> +.BR "tc ... action ct [ nat ] [ zone "
>> +.IR ZONE
>> +.BR "]"
>> +
>> +.ti -8
>> +.BR "tc ... action ct clear"
> seems like you are documenting existing capabilities vs something new to
> 5.8. correct?
Yes