[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518114401.GB5261@netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 13:44:02 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, mkubecek@...e.cz, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] nfp: don't check lack of RX/TX channels
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:49:01PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Core will now perform this check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_ethtool.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_ethtool.c
> index a5aa3219d112..6eb9fb9a1814 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_ethtool.c
> @@ -1438,8 +1438,7 @@ static int nfp_net_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> unsigned int total_rx, total_tx;
>
> /* Reject unsupported */
> - if (!channel->combined_count ||
> - channel->other_count != NFP_NET_NON_Q_VECTORS ||
> + if (channel->other_count != NFP_NET_NON_Q_VECTORS ||
> (channel->rx_count && channel->tx_count))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> --
> 2.25.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists