[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200519140348.GI624248@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 16:03:48 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, mkl@...gutronix.de,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Christian Herber <christian.herber@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/2] ethtool: provide UAPI for PHY Signal
Quality Index (SQI)
> --- a/net/ethtool/common.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/common.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,16 @@ int __ethtool_get_link(struct net_device *dev)
> return netif_running(dev) && dev->ethtool_ops->get_link(dev);
> }
>
> +int __ethtool_get_sqi(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct phy_device *phydev = dev->phydev;
> +
> + if (!phydev->drv->get_sqi)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return phydev->drv->get_sqi(phydev);
> +}
> +
You are only providing access via netlink ethtool? There is no ioctl
method to get this. If so, i wonder if common.c is the correct place
for this, or if it should be moved into linkstate.c. You can then drop
the __.
Michal?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists