lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:59:16 -0500 From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: dp83869: Set opmode from straps Jakub On 5/19/20 1:48 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2020 13:41:40 -0500 Dan Murphy wrote: >>> Is this now a standard GCC warning? Or have you turned on extra >>> checking? >> I still was not able to reproduce this warning with gcc-9.2. I would >> like to know the same > W=1 + gcc-10 here, also curious to know which one of the two makes > the difference :) W=1 made the difference I got the warning with gcc-9.2 Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists