netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: dp83869: Set opmode from straps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200519190316.GA652285@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 21:03:16 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: dp83869: Set opmode from straps

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 01:59:16PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Jakub
> 
> On 5/19/20 1:48 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 May 2020 13:41:40 -0500 Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > Is this now a standard GCC warning? Or have you turned on extra
> > > > checking?
> > > I still was not able to reproduce this warning with gcc-9.2.  I would
> > > like to know the same
> > W=1 + gcc-10 here, also curious to know which one of the two makes
> > the difference :)
> 
> W=1 made the difference I got the warning with gcc-9.2

I wonder if we should turn on this specific warning by default in
drivers/net/phy? I keep making the same mistake, and it would be nice
if GCC actually told me.

   Andrew