lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:16:55 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: devlink interface for asynchronous event/messages from firmware? On Wed, 20 May 2020 17:03:02 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote: > Hi Jiri, Jakub, > > I've been asked to investigate using devlink as a mechanism for > reporting asynchronous events/messages from firmware including > diagnostic messages, etc. > > Essentially, the ice firmware can report various status or diagnostic > messages which are useful for debugging internal behavior. We want to be > able to get these messages (and relevant data associated with them) in a > format beyond just "dump it to the dmesg buffer and recover it later". > > It seems like this would be an appropriate use of devlink. I thought > maybe this would work with devlink health: > > i.e. we create a devlink health reporter, and then when firmware sends a > message, we use devlink_health_report. > > But when I dug into this, it doesn't seem like a natural fit. The health > reporters expect to see an "error" state, and don't seem to really fit > the notion of "log a message from firmware" notion. > > One of the issues is that the health reporter only keeps one dump, when > what we really want is a way to have a monitoring application get the > dump and then store its contents. > > Thoughts on what might make sense for this? It feels like a stretch of > the health interface... > > I mean basically what I am thinking of having is using the devlink_fmsg > interface to just send a netlink message that then gets sent over the > devlink monitor socket and gets dumped immediately. Why does user space need a raw firmware interface in the first place? Examples?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists