[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200521001725.GW2491@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 21:17:25 -0300
From: 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: Pull the user copies out of the
individual sockopt functions.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:08:13PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
...
> Only SCTP_SOCKOPT_CONNECTX3 contains an indirect pointer.
> It is also the only getsockopt() that wants to return a buffer
> and an error code. It is also definitely abusing getsockopt().
...
> @@ -1375,11 +1350,11 @@ struct compat_sctp_getaddrs_old {
> #endif
>
> static int sctp_getsockopt_connectx3(struct sock *sk, int len,
> - char __user *optval,
> - int __user *optlen)
> + struct sctp_getaddrs_old *param,
> + int *optlen)
> {
> - struct sctp_getaddrs_old param;
> sctp_assoc_t assoc_id = 0;
> + struct sockaddr *addrs;
> int err = 0;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> @@ -1388,29 +1363,28 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_connectx3(struct sock *sk, int len,
>
> if (len < sizeof(param32))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (copy_from_user(¶m32, optval, sizeof(param32)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + param32 = *(struct compat_sctp_getaddrs_old *)param;
>
> - param.assoc_id = param32.assoc_id;
> - param.addr_num = param32.addr_num;
> - param.addrs = compat_ptr(param32.addrs);
> + param->assoc_id = param32.assoc_id;
> + param->addr_num = param32.addr_num;
> + param->addrs = compat_ptr(param32.addrs);
> } else
> #endif
> {
> - if (len < sizeof(param))
> + if (len < sizeof(*param))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (copy_from_user(¶m, optval, sizeof(param)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> - err = __sctp_setsockopt_connectx(sk, (struct sockaddr __user *)
> - param.addrs, param.addr_num,
> + addrs = memdup_user(param->addrs, param->addr_num);
I'm staring at this for a while now but I don't get this memdup_user.
AFAICT, params->addrs is not __user anymore here, because
sctp_getsockopt() copied the whole thing already, no?
Also weird because it is being called from kernel_sctp_getsockopt(),
which now has no knowledge of __user buffers.
Maybe I didn't get something from the patch description.
> + if (IS_ERR(addrs))
> + return PTR_ERR(addrs);
> +
> + err = __sctp_setsockopt_connectx(sk, addrs, param->addr_num,
> &assoc_id);
> + kfree(addrs);
> if (err == 0 || err == -EINPROGRESS) {
> - if (copy_to_user(optval, &assoc_id, sizeof(assoc_id)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - if (put_user(sizeof(assoc_id), optlen))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + *(sctp_assoc_t *)param = assoc_id;
> + *optlen = sizeof(assoc_id);
> }
>
> return err;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists