lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 09:24:58 +0200
From:   "Eelco Chaudron" <echaudro@...hat.com>
To:     "Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>, "Martin Lau" <kafai@...com>,
        "Song Liu" <songliubraving@...com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@...com>,
        "Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@...com>,
        "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix perf_buffer__free() API for sparse
 allocs



On 27 May 2020, at 19:58, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:42 AM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> In case the cpu_bufs are sparsely allocated they are not
>> all free'ed. These changes will fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
>> ---
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> You forgot:
>
> Fixes: fb84b8224655 ("libbpf: add perf buffer API")

Thanks, I forgot that :(  Daniel do you want me to send a v2, or will 
you add it when you apply it?

> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
>
>>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c |    5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index 5d60de6fd818..74d967619dcf 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -8137,9 +8137,12 @@ void perf_buffer__free(struct perf_buffer *pb)
>>         if (!pb)
>>                 return;
>>         if (pb->cpu_bufs) {
>> -               for (i = 0; i < pb->cpu_cnt && pb->cpu_bufs[i]; i++) 
>> {
>> +               for (i = 0; i < pb->cpu_cnt; i++) {
>>                         struct perf_cpu_buf *cpu_buf = 
>> pb->cpu_bufs[i];
>>
>> +                       if (!cpu_buf)
>> +                               continue;
>> +
>>                         bpf_map_delete_elem(pb->map_fd, 
>> &cpu_buf->map_key);
>>                         perf_buffer__free_cpu_buf(pb, cpu_buf);
>>                 }
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists