[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529180256.2e4d3940@carbon>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 18:02:56 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
toke@...hat.com, lorenzo@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] devmap: Formalize map value as a named
struct
On Fri, 29 May 2020 09:36:14 -0600
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> On 5/29/20 2:22 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > We do need this struct bpf_devmap_val, but I think it is wrong to make this UAPI.
> >
> > A BPF-prog can get this via: #include "vmlinux.h"
>
> sure. I see that now.
>
> I forgot to fold in a small update to the selftests, so I need to send a
> v4 anyways. I will wait until later in the day in case there are other
> comments.
I've just posted a patchset on top of this V3, that moves struct
bpf_devmap_val, and that demonstrate via code that I mean by
leveraging BTF for dynamic config API.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/159076794319.1387573.8722376887638960093.stgit@firesoul/
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists