[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1159570.1590937744@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:09:04 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: gaurav singh <gaurav1086@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] conn_client: Add check for rxpc channel
Hi,
Note that "conn_client:" isn't a suitable tag for the subject. You should use
"rxrpc:" instead.
How did you find this by the way? You shouldn't get a NULL pointer there.
Either the call is waiting for a channel to be assigned (in which case the
condition on:
if (!list_empty(&call->chan_wait_link)) {
will be true) or it should have been assigned a channel, in which case chan
will not be NULL.
Note that the function takes the lock under which this is managed
(conn->channel_lock) across this, so it shouldn't change.
Even __rxrpc_disconnect_call(), which is called to implicitly close out a call
that gets superseded on its channel, doesn't stop
rxrpc_disconnect_client_call() from finding the channel.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists