netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf: Use tracing helpers for lsm programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7HevOVgEe-g3RH_OmRqzWedXzGkuoNNzJfSwKhtzGxFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:00:05 -0700
From:   Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Use tracing helpers for lsm programs

On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do
> not include stack trace or perf event output. It's useful
> to have those for bpftrace lsm support [1].
>
> Using tracing_prog_func_proto helpers for lsm programs.

How about using raw_tp_prog_func_proto?

Thanks,
Song

PS: Please tag the patch with subject prefix "PATCH bpf" for
"PATCH bpf-next". I think this one belongs to bpf-next, which means
we should wait after the merge window.