netdev - Re: [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 04:53:34 +0200
From:   Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro

Hi Kees,

can you push that change also to kees/linux.git#kspp/uninit/v5.7/macro ?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
- Sedat -

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=kspp/uninit/v5.7/macro

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:44 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 06:47:13PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:40 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 05:02:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 16:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> > > > > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
> > > > > (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
> > > > > either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], effectively revert
> > > > > commit 16b7f3c89907 ("checkpatch: avoid warning about uninitialized_var()")
> > > > > and remove all remaining mentions of uninitialized_var().
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
> > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
> > > >
> > > > nack.  see below.
> > > >
> > > > I'd prefer a simple revert, but it shouldn't
> > > > be done here.
> > >
> > > What do you mean? (I can't understand this and "fine by me" below?)
> >
> > I did write "other than that"...
> >
> > I mean that the original commit fixed 2 issues,
> > one with the uninitialized_var addition, and
> > another with the missing void function declaration.
> >
> > I think I found the missing void function bit because
> > the uninitialized_var use looked like a function so I
> > fixed both things at the same time.
> >
> > If you change it, please just remove the bit that
> > checks for uninitialized_var.
>
> Ah! Gotcha. Thanks; I will update it.
>
> -Kees
>
> >
> > Thanks, Joe
> >
> > > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > > []
> > > > > @@ -4075,7 +4074,7 @@ sub process {
> > > > >                 }
> > > > >
> > > > >  # check for function declarations without arguments like "int foo()"
> > > > > -               if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> > > > > +               if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> > > >
> > > > This isn't right because $Type includes a possible trailing *
> > > > where there isn't a space between $Type and $Ident
> > >
> > > Ah, hm, that was changed in the mentioned commit:
> > >
> > > -               if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> > > +               if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> > >
> > > > e.g.:     int *bar(void);
> > > >
> > > > Other than that, fine by me...
> > >
> > > Thanks for looking it over! I'll adjust it however you'd like. :)
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Kees Cook
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/202006031944.9551FAA68E%40keescook.